← All articles
April 16, 2026 · Report

How the Standalone Hub Architecture Cuts Charging Site CAPEX by 32%

Piotr Krzemiński
Piotr Krzemiński
Founder | VP | CMO
Two WILLBERT Amber II chargers under the headline Standalone Hub, -32% CAPEX

When a Charge Point Operator plans an 8-plug DC fast-charging site, the choice of hardware architecture has a bigger impact on total investment than most operators expect. In this case study, we compare a conventional standalone charger deployment against WILLBERT's S-HUB configuration and show where €121,000 in savings actually come from.

Three Generations of Charging Architecture

Before diving into the numbers, it helps to understand how EV charging site design has evolved. The industry has moved through three distinct architectural generations, each solving problems the previous one created, while introducing trade-offs of its own.

Three charging architectures compared: standalone, distributed and Standalone Hub, by power, price per kW and usability

The Standalone Hub eliminates the core weakness of each predecessor. Unlike standalone chargers, it enables dynamic power allocation across multiple plugs. Unlike distributed systems, it does so without dedicated power cabinets, long DC cable runs, or the maintenance overhead of a complex high-voltage DC bus.

The Site: 8 Plugs at a Retail Location

Our comparison looks at a real-world scenario: an 8-plug DC fast-charging site at a retail park. Both configurations deliver 8 CCS charging points, each capable of at least 240 kW at 400 V and up to 480 kW at 800 V vehicle architectures. The CAPEX estimate covers hardware and cabling and it intentionally excludes shared infrastructure (transformer substation, trenching) since those are identical in both scenarios.

Option A: Typical Standalone (4 × 400 kW all-in-one chargers)

Four standalone chargers, each rated at 400 kW, each operating independently. Power is dynamically shared across 2 CCS outputs per unit, but cannot flow between chargers. Total installed power: 1.6 MW — significantly more grid capacity than typically needed, since each charger must be sized for peak demand independently.

Classic standalone layout: four 400 kW chargers for eight bays, 1.6 MW installed, €378,000 total CAPEX

Classic Standalone site layout and assumptions

Option B: S-HUB (4 × WILLBERT Amber II 1F, paired into 2 S-HUB systems)

Four Amber II chargers, each with 4 power modules, paired into 2 S-HUB systems. Each S-HUB delivers 480 kW dynamically across 4 CCS outputs. Total installed power: 0.96 MW - 40% less grid connection than the standalone option, while delivering equal or higher per-plug peak power. Each S-HUB can also be upgraded to 720 kW.

S-HUB layout: four Amber II chargers paired into two S-HUB systems, 0.96 MW installed, €257,000 total CAPEX

Standalone Hub site layout and assumptions

Bar charts of cabling cost, €44k versus €26k, and total CAPEX, €378k versus €257k, for standalone and S-HUB
€121,000 saved The S-HUB configuration reduces total site CAPEX by 32%, with cabling costs alone dropping 41% (€18,000 less) thanks to the simplified architecture and lower installed power requirement.

What Makes the Difference?

The savings come from two reinforcing effects. First, less installed power. Because the S-HUB dynamically allocates power where it's needed, the site requires 0.96 MW instead of 1.6 MW - a 40% reduction in grid connection and power electronics. In practice, most vehicles on a site are never all charging at peak simultaneously, so the standalone approach massively over-provisions capacity that sits idle most of the time.

Second, simpler cabling. With paired S-HUB chargers sharing power via a short DC link, the total cable runs from transformer to charging points are shorter and require fewer independent high-power feeds. That translates directly into less copper, fewer cable trenches, and a faster installation timeline.

Beyond Cost: The Upgrade Advantage

Table comparing a 4 × 400 kW standalone site with an Amber II S-HUB site on power, sharing, upgrade path and CAPEX

Perhaps the most underrated advantage is future-proofing. The standalone configuration is locked at 400 kW per charger with no upgrade path. The S-HUB can be upgraded to 720 kW per system, meaning as vehicle battery sizes grow and charging curves steepen, the same hardware can keep pace without a forklift replacement.

The Bottom Line

For operators deploying 8-plug sites at retail locations, switching from standalone chargers to WILLBERT's S-HUB architecture delivers a compelling set of improvements: 32% lower CAPEX, 40% less grid capacity required, higher per-plug peak power, better power utilisation, and a built-in upgrade path to 720 kW. All is achievable with a simpler installation.

The maths are straightforward. The same number of plugs, better performance for drivers, and €121,000 back in the operator's pocket per site. At scale across a portfolio of 10, 20, or 50 sites, that's the difference between a marginal business case and a comfortable one.

‍

Piotr Krzemiński
Piotr Krzemiński
Founder | VP | CMO

Piotr Krzemiński leads marketing and business strategy at WILLBERT, shaping its retail-focused EV charging solutions. With a background in management, he brings deep expertise from top marketing agencies to drive brand growth and market positioning.

Stay in the loop

Get the latest on EV charging, forecourt retail, and the WILLBERT ecosystem — straight to your inbox.

EV charging & retail insights, no spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Articles you might be interested in

Illustration of two low-voltage connections, 120 kVA and 180 kVA, combined by S-HUB into 300 kW for charging
December 19, 2025 · Insight

When Low Voltage Delivers High Power

The grid connection decides what a charging site can do. S-HUB combines two independent low-voltage connections on the DC side, so sites without medium-voltage access can still deliver high-power charging.

Illustration of modular power blocks feeding linked chargers on a forecourt
August 12, 2025 · Insight

Charge Smarter, Not Harder: Scalable EV Infrastructure for Retailers

Grid upgrades are slow, costly and rigid. How modular power and S-HUB let roadside retailers start small, add 60 kW modules as demand grows, and spend less on installation than a distributed system.

Comparison of 18 distributed charging devices, 12 power cabinets and 6 user units, with 2 WILLBERT Amber II S-HUB units
November 12, 2023 · Insight

Ultra-fast DC Chargers: Distributed vs Standalone. Why Not Both? Introducing WILLBERT Amber II S-Hub

Distributed systems give flexibility but need power cabinets and long cable runs. Standalone chargers are simple but limited. Why the Amber II S-HUB was built to combine the strengths of both.

Your EV charging journey starts with strategy

Our advisors help you plan, deploy, and scale retail-integrated charging

Mikko Summala
SpeaksUKFinlandSweden
Mikko Summala
Sales Manager
For customers in:
Nordics,UK
Contact via LinkedIn
Maciej Ochocki
SpeaksUKPoland
Maciej Ochocki
Sales Manager
For customers in:
Central & Eastern Europe,UK
Contact via LinkedIn
Karim D'Hondt
SpeaksBelgiumNetherlandsFrance
Karim D'Hondt
Sales Manager
For customers in:
Benelux,France
Contact via LinkedIn

Can’t find your region? Get in touch via the contact form.